Toeing the Turks, despite blocking "Twitter"

Turkish government's decision to withhold "Twitter" and "YouTube" It seems he did not achieve

their goal, according to confirmed figures. And experienced in the field of Internet and information to citizens generalize more than one way to get around this decision through social networking sites and the walls of the streets in Turkey.

On the twentieth of March / March this decision was made for the Turkish government to block the site " Twitter " .. after forty-eight hours of the resolution was a record number of 1.2 million tweets tweet or about 17 thousand Tweets per minute according to the company , " Siswmus " competent monitoring networking sites social .

If the government's goal of blocking " Twitter " a few days ago and " YouTube " hours before cutting the road in front of the Turks to enter these sites , it is clear that the government has not achieved its goal as confirm the numbers.

But how the Turks managed to jump on the decision to withhold Twitter and then YouTube ?

Speaking specialist in social networking sites , we find left three ways:

 Internet via a virtual private network , or so-called "VPN" where through which the citizen is located in Turkey access to the Internet via a network abroad without being able to one of the prosecution , where it will appear as if the Internet is used from another country .

Through the replacement of "DNS" or what is known as "Domain Name System" for the country Pal "DNS" your another country .

New cross-browser "BROWSER" name " Tor " or "TOR" can be downloaded on your computer or phone and believes that the privacy of the user's browser to prevent anyone from knowing his or followed . The work of the " Tour" to allow access to blocked sites through the use of " virtual address " or "IP" from more than one user outside of Turkey .

Through service "SMS" provided by the site " Twitter " where subscribers can this service send a text message to the site " Twitter " , which turns it into a " tweet ." However, it has benefited from this method are the only participants who were in the service before the issuance of the decision.